Post-investment reporting is often a mess of broken Excel links and 2 AM fire drills. Investors want clean numbers; you just want to make it out of the board meeting alive. Built by former CFOs who have been in the hot seat, Abacum is the single source of truth for finance teams who have outgrown their spreadsheets. It’s why portfolio companies from Insight Partners, Apax, Thoma Bravo, and more trust us to automate their reporting.
Download our latest guide: Private Equity in the AI Age to see what actually changes for finance when AI meets private equity.
At the bottom of this post you’ll get a quick round up on who’s taking the CFO seat at PE-backed companies. Scroll down for the latest from The Knot, Paramount, and AuditBoard.
How Forecasting Changes as You Scale
"The less you do, the more you do. Let's see you pop up… That's not it at all… Do less… Ok, no, you gotta do more than that, it looks like you're boogie boarding."
This scene reminds me of the forecasting process at early-stage companies. The number of cycles I've wasted over-engineering a six-tab Excel forecast just to be 40% off—when I could have been 10% off using simple multiplication on a yellow legal pad—is more than one.
I recently talked to Kevin Drost, CFO at New Era ADR, a PE-backed company modernizing dispute resolution in the legal space. Before that, he helped scale and sell Reverb, a used instrument marketplace, to Etsy. He's gone from literally having no data to forecast the business, to having a well-oiled BI team tasked with forecasting to Wall Street within 50 bps.

He's also seen what happens when you try to force big-company rigor into a business that's not ready for it.
The Role of Forecasting Early On: Alignment > Accuracy
In the earliest days, Kevin argues, forecasting serves a completely different purpose than it does later in the lifecycle. It's about setting a shared hypothesis for where you're going—which in many cases, is directional.
The business doesn't have the historical inputs or pattern recognition to justify anything close to certainty. Trying to model cash flows or LTV:CAC with three decimal points of precision becomes a wasted exercise.
“I pray for the confidence of a seed stage founder with three months of selling history and a forecasted LTV to CAC of 9”
I remember joining a sub-$10M company and trying to predict what our first quarter's sales in Asia would be. We had never sold a single thing in Asia, and the rep we were relying on was calling from a landline in Europe. Talk about trying to nail jello to a tree. Yet… did that stop me from building a four-tab model? Nope.
Those first forecasts are really about internal alignment. What are we aiming for? How will we know if we're making progress? When do we need to hire, adjust pricing, or raise capital? These are directional bets, not engineered outcomes.
As Kevin put it,
"You're making guesses. And the earlier you are, the more they're just pure guesses. That's why it's more of a goal-setting tool than a cash flow projection tool."
When There’s No Data, Build Assumptions That Hold
One of the hardest parts of early-stage forecasting is the absence of data. I asked Kevin how he approached market sizing when Reverb was just getting off the ground.
“There’s no data in the world that will tell you how many used guitars were sold at garage sales last year. But you still have to take a stand. Is this a $10 billion industry or a $100 billion one?”
So they found a proxy:

Reliable data existed for new instrument sales (~$10B in the U.S.)
Reverb had strong relationships with independent guitar retailers
They asked a simple question: for every new instrument you sell, how many used ones do you sell?
The ratio came out roughly one-to-one
Bottom-up from there to estimate the total market
It wasn't elegant. But it was functional.
“What’s the incremental benefit of getting from 80 percent to 85 percent confidence?” Kevin asked. “It’s usually almost nothing. So forget it. Go with what you’ve got and keep moving.”
The goal isn't to be right. That's impossible. It's to be right enough to get the car out of the driveway so you can allocate resources, test your roadmap, and course correct along the way.
False Rigor: The Greatest Lie the Devil Ever Told
This is where a lot of teams fall into trouble. They build highly complex models with dozens of inputs, all formatted cleanly and backed by "data" that, in reality, isn't meaningful. Kevin calls this the trap of false rigor.
"If we had tried doing that at year one of Reverb, it would've been a completely wasted effort. You end up manufacturing confidence based on inputs that are either made up or statistically meaningless."
This is a common mistake, especially for operators coming out of big companies or consulting (guilty as charged with the big braining it). They think forecasting is about building a beautiful model. It can make you breakfast and predict sunset in any geography, but can't tell you how many software licenses you'll sell next month.
Early-stage forecasts are about decision enablement:
What's the customer behavior?
What levers can we influence?
Which assumptions are doing the most work?
How long can we afford to test the above?
Counterintuitively, sometimes you need to "do less" in order to see the picture more clearly.
Turning Forecasts Into Decision Engines
Once Reverb had enough transaction data, they refined their approach. They weren't just looking at return on ad spend—they were tracking the marginal return on each new dollar. That allowed them to push marketing spend up to the point where returns started to flatten, and no further.
"The trick is spending every single dollar humanly possible up until you're at that one-to-one or slightly higher return ratio and then stopping. If you're spending less than that, you're leaving money on the table. If you're spending more, you're burning cash."
That level of control only comes when you pair analytical rigor with solid data. And also understanding where and when your customers want to transact.
Speaking of that… you earn a series of secrets on your customer profile if when you embed yourself into the customer experience.
At Reverb, every new hire was given $1,000 each quarter with one directive: buy and sell as much gear as you can on the platform. Whoever had the most money left over at the end (and the most transactions) won.
This wasn't a quirky startup perk. It was a systems-level onboarding strategy.
"We wanted everyone at the company to know what it felt like to be a customer. Not just the marketer or the product manager. The lawyer. The finance person. Everyone."
It worked. Decisions were better because the team had firsthand experience. You can't build an accurate model of behavior you don't understand.
When Rigor Becomes Non-Negotiable
That scrappy mindset doesn't last forever. When Reverb was acquired by Etsy, Kevin had to completely change how he thought about modeling. Forecasts weren't just for internal use anymore. They were shared with a corporate parent, embedded into investor decks, and had to be bulletproof.
"You have to develop a set of projections that are dead accurate and able to be given to the Street. The level of rigor is completely different."
Having an entire BI team at your disposal, with a decade of historical data cleanly segmented by customer type, is a much different scenario than where he started—with no data at all.
Match the Effort to the Stage
Forecasting is a muscle. And like any training program, the intensity should match your current level. Too little rigor, and you're making blind bets. Too much, too early, and you're wasting time on manufactured certainty.
Some of the best finance leaders I know are ruthless simplifiers. They love a ten-tab model that takes up 124 GBs. But they really love a plan on one page of a yellow legal pad that tells them how many reps they should hire to produce $10M in incremental revenue.
Because yes, every model is wrong. But the decisions it supports? Those need to be right.

Run the Numbers Podcast
Kevin explains the art of Cowboy Forecasting, and how to evaluate the level of effort you put into your forecast across various stages.
Leveraged Moves
Recent C-suite shifts across the private equity landscape… because people moves are performance levers too.
Renowned wedding planning platform The Knot Worldwide named Michael Pickrum as CFO. Pickrum brings two decades of finance leadership, most recently as CFO of Maximum Effort, a media, marketing and investment company co-founded by actor Ryan Reynolds, and ExecOnline, a B2B online leadership development company. Prior to this, Pickrum spent more than 17 years at BET/Viacom, including roles as EVP and CFO. The Knot Worldwide operates as a private company today, after Permira and Spectrum Equity took XO Group (parent company of The Knot) private for approximately $933M and merged it with WeddingWire, which they already backed.
Paramount named board member Dennis Cinelli as new CFO, amid the company's bidding war for Warner Bros. Discovery. Cinelli comes from Scale AI, where he served as CFO since 2022. Prior to that he spent six years at Uber across senior finance and operations roles, and GE Ventures, where he served as CFO. Paramount Skydance is primarily backed by RedBird Capital Partners and KKR, alongside the Ellison family (of Oracle fame).
AuditBoard, a leading AI-powered global platform for connected risk, announced Hugo Doetsch as CFO. Doetsch joins with more than two decades of financial leadership and strategic operating experience with the likes of Symplr, NetDocuments, and Ping Identity. AuditBoard was acquired in by PE firm Hg for more than $3B in 2024, marking a significant shift from potential IPO to PE transaction. It recently surpassed $300M in ARR.
Thanks for reading, and make sure to check out our sponsor, Abacum.
Download the 2026 Finance Guide: Lessons from the Trenches to get the tactical frameworks used by top PE-backed leader for FREE.

