Every day you're late to AI, you fall two days behind. That gap is closing fast - and your competitors know it.
NetSuite Next is how you catch up. It's the all-in-one business management suite - financials, inventory, HR, CRM - now with AI built into everything. Custom insights surface automatically. AI agents handle the routine work. And when you have a question? Just ask, like you're talking to a colleague.
Trusted by over 43,000 companies. Built for every industry.
For the first time ever, try NetSuite Next free. Visit NetSuite.ai/METRICS - if your revenue hits seven figures, this is built for you.
The Cap Table You Inherit Is Already Wrong
Hi, it's CJ Gustafson and welcome to Looking for Leverage.
My CFO friend Rick Smith wrote a novel with a CFO in it named Ezra. Ezra has a law he repeats on the first day of every new CFO job:
“Every cap table I inherit is wrong.”
While he's a made-up guy at a made-up company, I've inherited enough cap tables with alligators in them to corroborate his claim. And unfortunately the moment you find out he's right is the worst possible one: when you're trying to sell the company.
You know how an equity waterfall works. It’s what the paying agent executes against at close, and you sign a rep in the purchase agreement warranting it's complete and accurate. When it isn't, the fix comes out of escrow, or out of the sponsor's proceeds. Much less fun phone call.
Two I've lived
A few years back I was in the middle of exit prep and I had our option ledger open. Sitting on it was a batch of vested grants with exercise windows about to close. Some belonged to people who'd already left the company. A couple expiring grants belonged to tenured employees still with us. As far as I could tell, most of them had no idea the window was closing (it's not usually front of mind, especially if it's been multiple years), and obviously none of them knew we were selling.
So I did some math that didn't feel great. If I reminded these folks to exercise, they most likely would, and every exercised option dilutes everyone else in the waterfall: existing investors, management (including myself), and rank and file employees (current and former) who'd already exercised.
For better or worse, the answer that protected existing holders and honored the confidentiality I was bound to was to simply sit on my hands and let the windows run out.
I didn't love it then and I don't love it now.
The second scenario is even less straight forward.
We had an employee, still with us, who'd been told by our COO that he'd get a chunk of shares when he got promoted. He did indeed get promoted, and was a contributing member of the sale team. However, the shares never got papered. There was no board approval, no grant in the system, and no email correspondence I could even point to.
And to make matters worse, the COO who made the promise had since left. So I had a current, productive employee who believed he owned something, a departed executive who'd made the commitment, and not one document tying the two together (oh, and a CFO left holding the bag). Every cap table carries a few of these, calls made and then half-forgotten, sometimes by people who've since left.
And selling the company awakens the dead.
Why these pile up in PE-backed companies
A lot of sponsor-owned businesses didn't start life as buyout targets. They were venture-backed companies that grew up, didn't make it to the public markets, and got bought by a PE firm instead. Which means the cap table your sponsor diligenced was already carrying a decade of VC-era leftovers. I'm talking about option grants to employees who left in 2016, a warrant the venture lender attached to a loan that was paid back in full and nobody remembers, friends-and-family “advisors” from the seed round, and a long string of promises made across three different CFOs over ten years.
Many times PE firms will take majority control, clearing out all the cartilage on the cap table. But in some instances they will allow existing shareholders to roll.
If it’s the latter, when PE steps into the VC's shadow and takes control of the company, diligence usually does run a tie-out, matching the cap table software against the executed grant agreements and board consents. That catches plenty. But at the same time, it can't catch an obligation nobody papered, because there's no document to tie out to, and by then the people who'd remember the conversation have scattered. So the sponsor buys the company, inherits whatever survived, and those sins of the past go dormant for the length of the hold.
The pool math lurking
My friend Maor Levran founded an equity management platform, Slice, which means he's seen the inside of a lot more cap tables than I have. When I asked him what actually goes wrong, he started somewhere I didn't expect: the pool math.
Companies track an option pool in three buckets:
available,
allocated
exercised.
When someone exercises and then sells those shares in a tender, the shares often stop getting tracked, but the pool keeps counting them. Now your fully diluted share count is overstated, and every price per share calculation built on top of it is off. One company he onboarded turned out to be missing 400,000 shares from prior rounds. They caught it just after closing a round and corrected it retroactively, which was inconvenient, but survivable. His estimate is that the same error found during M&A runs 15 to 20 times more expensive to fix.
Then, three to five years later, the sponsor sells, either to another sponsor or to a strategic buyer. And now the cap table has a second layer on top of the first:
management incentive units granted at close, some forfeited by executives who churned and maybe not processed cleanly;
rollover equity from the founders;
leaver mechanics that may or may not have been run correctly when people walked.
Underneath all of it lurks the un-caught venture-era stuff from the company's first life.
And both layers need to get certified at once. Your dealing with a zombie ISO grant from 2016 and the un-cancelled PIU from the new structure you moved to last year.
Where to look
The errors cluster in the same few spots:
Expiring and expired options: Grants past their window or about to be, and the question of who was told what, when (the first of my personal scenarios above).
Promised-but-never-papered: Equity committed in an offer letter, a promotion conversation, or a board discussion that never became an issued grant with approvals behind it (the second of my personal scenarios above).
Zombie grants: Options or PIUs that auto-forfeited when someone left but were never cancelled in the system, so they still sit there looking live and increasing the denominator (you want to cancel these out because they raise the share price for everyone else!)
Papered but never authorized: The inverse of the one above, and easy to miss because the paperwork looks right. A grant with a real signed agreement behind it that skipped an approval it needed. My friend Maor watched an international company issue equity that required a shareholder vote under local corporate law, which nobody obtained. It surfaced during M&A diligence and cost the holder roughly $1M, which the holder claimed back from the company.
Rollover mismatches: What the founders think they rolled versus what’s recorded (a super fun thing to discover your first time in the data room).
Missing consents: Spousal consents, transfer paperwork, and option cancellation agreements that everyone agreed to and nobody actually signed.
Missed 83(b) elections: These get filed on restricted stock, founders' shares, early-exercised options, and profits interests. On PIUs the election generally isn't strictly required, but practitioners file it as protection and you want to know whether yours was filed. Miss the 30-day window and it's usually not fixable. I wrote about PIUs recently.
These are all tracking and compliance gaps that compound until a buyer's diligence team forces them into the open.
What to do before you need to
The worst time to meet your cap table is sixty days into a sale process. So:
Reconcile the entire cap table to source documents now, while there’s no deal pressure. Go through every holder and every grant, back to a board approval and a signed agreement. Ezra from the book does it one line at a time (I know it sucks), and so should you.
Chase the undocumented promises on purpose: Ask your longest-tenured HR and legal people who was told what by whom if there are any loose ends from your reconciliation, especially for executives who’ve since left and have employment agreements.
Read the capitalization rep in your own purchase agreement (if you were bought).
Wishing you a cap table that ties out on the first pass,
CJ
Looking for Leverage breaks down one PE term, clause, or mechanic each week, written for the CFOs and finance leaders who actually have to live with these things. If this got forwarded to you, subscribe at lookingforleverage.com. If there's a term you want broken down, reply and tell me. I read everything.
Thanks for reading, and make sure to check out our sponsor, Netsuite.
Readers of Looking for Leverage can try NetSuite Next for free.

